10.3 Parameter Learning for Logistic Regression
Introduction
Learning optimal parameters for logistic regression involves finding weights and bias that best fit training data. We use Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) and gradient-based optimization methods. Understanding these optimization techniques is crucial as they form the foundation for training neural networks and LLMs.
1. Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Given training data \(\{(\mathbf{x}_i, y_i)\}_{i=1}^{n}\) where \(y_i \in \{0, 1\}\), we want to find parameters \(\boldsymbol{\theta} = (\mathbf{w}, b)\) that maximize probability of observed labels.
Likelihood Function
For single observation: $$P(y_i | \mathbf{x}_i, \boldsymbol{\theta}) = \begin{cases} \sigma(\mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}_i + b) & \text{if } y_i = 1 \\ 1 - \sigma(\mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}_i + b) & \text{if } y_i = 0 \end{cases}$$
Compact form: $$P(y_i | \mathbf{x}_i, \boldsymbol{\theta}) = \sigma(\mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}_i + b)^{y_i} \cdot (1 - \sigma(\mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}_i + b))^{1-y_i}$$
Assuming independence, likelihood for all data: $$L(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} P(y_i | \mathbf{x}_i, \boldsymbol{\theta})$$
Log-Likelihood
Taking logarithm (monotonic transformation preserves maximum): $$\ell(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = \log L(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left[ y_i \log \sigma(z_i) + (1-y_i) \log(1-\sigma(z_i)) \right]$$ where \(z_i = \mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}_i + b\)
2. Cross-Entropy Loss
We typically minimize negative log-likelihood (loss function): $$J(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = -\frac{1}{n}\ell(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = -\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} \left[ y_i \log \hat{y}_i + (1-y_i) \log(1-\hat{y}_i) \right]$$ where \(\hat{y}_i = \sigma(\mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}_i + b)\) is predicted probability.
This is binary cross-entropy loss, fundamental in training classification models.
Interactive: Loss Surface
Visualize loss landscape for two parameters:
Convex surface: Cross-entropy loss is convex - single global minimum
Gradient descent: Follows steepest descent path to minimum
3. Gradient Computation
To minimize loss, we need gradients with respect to parameters.
Gradient with respect to weights
Using chain rule: $$\frac{\partial J}{\partial w_j} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} (\hat{y}_i - y_i) x_{ij}$$
Vector form: $$\nabla_{\mathbf{w}} J = \frac{1}{n}\mathbf{X}^T (\hat{\mathbf{y}} - \mathbf{y})$$ where \(\mathbf{X} \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}\) is design matrix.
Gradient with respect to bias
$$\frac{\partial J}{\partial b} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} (\hat{y}_i - y_i)$$
Key Property
Gradient has elegant form: \((\text{prediction} - \text{truth}) \times \text{feature}\)
This is same form as linear regression! Sigmoid's derivative property makes this work.
Interactive: Gradient Visualization
See how gradient points toward optimal parameters:
Current Loss
{{currentLoss | number:4}}
Gradient ∂J/∂w
{{gradW | number:3}}
Gradient ∂J/∂b
{{gradB | number:3}}
4. Gradient Descent Algorithm
Iterative optimization algorithm that updates parameters in direction of negative gradient:
Update Rule
$$\mathbf{w}^{(t+1)} = \mathbf{w}^{(t)} - \alpha \nabla_{\mathbf{w}} J(\boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t)})$$ $$b^{(t+1)} = b^{(t)} - \alpha \frac{\partial J}{\partial b}(\boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t)})$$ where \(\alpha > 0\) is learning rate (step size).
Algorithm Steps
- Initialize parameters (often to zero or small random values)
- Compute predictions \(\hat{\mathbf{y}}\) using current parameters
- Compute loss \(J(\boldsymbol{\theta})\)
- Compute gradients \(\nabla_{\mathbf{w}} J, \frac{\partial J}{\partial b}\)
- Update parameters using gradients and learning rate
- Repeat steps 2-5 until convergence
Interactive: Gradient Descent Training
Watch gradient descent optimize parameters:
Iteration
{{iteration}}
Loss
{{trainLoss | number:4}}
Accuracy
{{trainAccuracy | number:3}}
5. Learning Rate Selection
Learning rate \(\alpha\) critically affects convergence:
- Too small: Slow convergence, many iterations needed
- Too large: Overshooting, oscillation, divergence
- Just right: Fast, stable convergence
Common Strategies
- Fixed: Constant learning rate (simple, may not be optimal)
- Decay: Decrease over time (e.g., \(\alpha_t = \alpha_0 / (1 + kt)\))
- Adaptive: Different rates per parameter (Adam, RMSprop)
- Line search: Optimize step size each iteration
Interactive: Learning Rate Comparison
Compare convergence with different learning rates:
Small LR: Slow but stable
Large LR: Fast but may overshoot or diverge
Optimal LR: Balance between speed and stability
6. Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)
Standard gradient descent computes gradient using all data (batch gradient descent). For large datasets, this is expensive.
SGD Variants
- Stochastic (online): Use one sample at a time $$\mathbf{w} \leftarrow \mathbf{w} - \alpha (\hat{y}_i - y_i) \mathbf{x}_i$$
- Mini-batch: Use small batch of samples (most common) $$\mathbf{w} \leftarrow \mathbf{w} - \alpha \frac{1}{|B|} \sum_{i \in B} (\hat{y}_i - y_i) \mathbf{x}_i$$
Advantages of SGD
- Much faster per iteration (fewer computations)
- Can escape local minima (noisy updates)
- Enables online learning (update as data arrives)
- Works with massive datasets that don't fit in memory
Interactive: Batch vs SGD
Compare batch gradient descent with mini-batch SGD:
Batch size = N: Smooth, deterministic updates
Batch size = 1: Noisy but fast per iteration
Mini-batch: Good balance (typical: 32, 64, 128, 256)
7. Convergence Criteria
When to stop training? Common criteria:
- Max iterations: Stop after fixed number of steps
- Loss threshold: Stop when \(J(\boldsymbol{\theta}) < \epsilon\)
- Gradient norm: Stop when \(\|\nabla J\| < \epsilon\)
- Parameter change: Stop when \(\|\boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t+1)} - \boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t)}\| < \epsilon\)
- Validation performance: Stop when validation loss stops improving (early stopping)
8. Regularization
To prevent overfitting, add penalty term to loss function:
L2 Regularization (Ridge)
$$J_{\text{reg}}(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = J(\boldsymbol{\theta}) + \frac{\lambda}{2} \|\mathbf{w}\|^2$$ Gradient becomes: $$\nabla_{\mathbf{w}} J_{\text{reg}} = \nabla_{\mathbf{w}} J + \lambda \mathbf{w}$$
L1 Regularization (Lasso)
$$J_{\text{reg}}(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = J(\boldsymbol{\theta}) + \lambda \|\mathbf{w}\|_1$$ Encourages sparse solutions (many weights become exactly zero).
Interactive: Regularization Effect
See how regularization affects parameter values:
No regularization: May overfit with large weights
L2: Shrinks all weights toward zero
L1: Drives some weights to exactly zero (feature selection)
9. Newton's Method
Second-order optimization using Hessian (matrix of second derivatives):
$$\boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t+1)} = \boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t)} - H^{-1} \nabla J(\boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t)})$$ where \(H\) is Hessian matrix.
Advantages
- Faster convergence (quadratic near optimum)
- No learning rate needed
Disadvantages
- Expensive: requires computing and inverting \(d \times d\) Hessian
- Not practical for high-dimensional problems (modern LLMs have billions of parameters)
10. Application to LLMs
Training logistic regression teaches fundamentals used in LLMs:
- Backpropagation: Chain rule for computing gradients (same principle)
- SGD variants: Adam, AdamW used in transformer training
- Cross-entropy loss: Same loss for language modeling (over vocabulary)
- Learning rate schedules: Warmup + decay critical for LLM training
- Gradient clipping: Prevent exploding gradients
- Batch size: Trade-off between speed and gradient noise
Interactive: Training Dynamics
Observe complete training process with loss curve:
Final Results
Training Loss: {{finalTrainLoss | number:4}}
Training Accuracy: {{finalTrainAcc | number:3}}
Iterations: {{finalIter}}
Key Takeaways
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation gives principled approach to parameter learning
- Cross-entropy loss is negative log-likelihood
- Gradient has elegant form: (prediction - truth) × feature
- Gradient descent iteratively moves toward minimum
- Learning rate critically affects convergence speed and stability
- Stochastic/mini-batch gradient descent enables large-scale training
- Regularization prevents overfitting
- These techniques generalize to neural networks and LLMs
- Modern optimizers (Adam) build on these foundations
Interactive: Likelihood Surface (w, b)
Explore negative log-likelihood (NLL) landscape for a single-feature logistic regression model. Adjust dataset separability and run gradient descent.