Scan with Phone

Scan to instantly open and share this page on your mobile device.

Link copied to clipboard!

10.3 Parameter Learning for Logistic Regression

Introduction

Learning optimal parameters for logistic regression involves finding weights and bias that best fit training data. We use Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) and gradient-based optimization methods. Understanding these optimization techniques is crucial as they form the foundation for training neural networks and LLMs.

1. Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Given training data \(\{(\mathbf{x}_i, y_i)\}_{i=1}^{n}\) where \(y_i \in \{0, 1\}\), we want to find parameters \(\boldsymbol{\theta} = (\mathbf{w}, b)\) that maximize probability of observed labels.

Likelihood Function

For single observation: $$P(y_i | \mathbf{x}_i, \boldsymbol{\theta}) = \begin{cases} \sigma(\mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}_i + b) & \text{if } y_i = 1 \\ 1 - \sigma(\mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}_i + b) & \text{if } y_i = 0 \end{cases}$$

Compact form: $$P(y_i | \mathbf{x}_i, \boldsymbol{\theta}) = \sigma(\mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}_i + b)^{y_i} \cdot (1 - \sigma(\mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}_i + b))^{1-y_i}$$

Assuming independence, likelihood for all data: $$L(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} P(y_i | \mathbf{x}_i, \boldsymbol{\theta})$$

Log-Likelihood

Taking logarithm (monotonic transformation preserves maximum): $$\ell(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = \log L(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left[ y_i \log \sigma(z_i) + (1-y_i) \log(1-\sigma(z_i)) \right]$$ where \(z_i = \mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}_i + b\)

2. Cross-Entropy Loss

We typically minimize negative log-likelihood (loss function): $$J(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = -\frac{1}{n}\ell(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = -\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} \left[ y_i \log \hat{y}_i + (1-y_i) \log(1-\hat{y}_i) \right]$$ where \(\hat{y}_i = \sigma(\mathbf{w}^T \mathbf{x}_i + b)\) is predicted probability.

This is binary cross-entropy loss, fundamental in training classification models.

Interactive: Loss Surface

Visualize loss landscape for two parameters:

Convex surface: Cross-entropy loss is convex - single global minimum

Gradient descent: Follows steepest descent path to minimum

3. Gradient Computation

To minimize loss, we need gradients with respect to parameters.

Gradient with respect to weights

Using chain rule: $$\frac{\partial J}{\partial w_j} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} (\hat{y}_i - y_i) x_{ij}$$

Vector form: $$\nabla_{\mathbf{w}} J = \frac{1}{n}\mathbf{X}^T (\hat{\mathbf{y}} - \mathbf{y})$$ where \(\mathbf{X} \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}\) is design matrix.

Gradient with respect to bias

$$\frac{\partial J}{\partial b} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} (\hat{y}_i - y_i)$$

Key Property

Gradient has elegant form: \((\text{prediction} - \text{truth}) \times \text{feature}\)

This is same form as linear regression! Sigmoid's derivative property makes this work.

Interactive: Gradient Visualization

See how gradient points toward optimal parameters:

Current Loss

{{currentLoss | number:4}}

Gradient ∂J/∂w

{{gradW | number:3}}

Gradient ∂J/∂b

{{gradB | number:3}}

4. Gradient Descent Algorithm

Iterative optimization algorithm that updates parameters in direction of negative gradient:

Update Rule

$$\mathbf{w}^{(t+1)} = \mathbf{w}^{(t)} - \alpha \nabla_{\mathbf{w}} J(\boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t)})$$ $$b^{(t+1)} = b^{(t)} - \alpha \frac{\partial J}{\partial b}(\boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t)})$$ where \(\alpha > 0\) is learning rate (step size).

Algorithm Steps

  1. Initialize parameters (often to zero or small random values)
  2. Compute predictions \(\hat{\mathbf{y}}\) using current parameters
  3. Compute loss \(J(\boldsymbol{\theta})\)
  4. Compute gradients \(\nabla_{\mathbf{w}} J, \frac{\partial J}{\partial b}\)
  5. Update parameters using gradients and learning rate
  6. Repeat steps 2-5 until convergence

Interactive: Gradient Descent Training

Watch gradient descent optimize parameters:

Iteration

{{iteration}}

Loss

{{trainLoss | number:4}}

Accuracy

{{trainAccuracy | number:3}}

5. Learning Rate Selection

Learning rate \(\alpha\) critically affects convergence:

  • Too small: Slow convergence, many iterations needed
  • Too large: Overshooting, oscillation, divergence
  • Just right: Fast, stable convergence

Common Strategies

  • Fixed: Constant learning rate (simple, may not be optimal)
  • Decay: Decrease over time (e.g., \(\alpha_t = \alpha_0 / (1 + kt)\))
  • Adaptive: Different rates per parameter (Adam, RMSprop)
  • Line search: Optimize step size each iteration

Interactive: Learning Rate Comparison

Compare convergence with different learning rates:

Small LR: Slow but stable

Large LR: Fast but may overshoot or diverge

Optimal LR: Balance between speed and stability

6. Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)

Standard gradient descent computes gradient using all data (batch gradient descent). For large datasets, this is expensive.

SGD Variants

  • Stochastic (online): Use one sample at a time $$\mathbf{w} \leftarrow \mathbf{w} - \alpha (\hat{y}_i - y_i) \mathbf{x}_i$$
  • Mini-batch: Use small batch of samples (most common) $$\mathbf{w} \leftarrow \mathbf{w} - \alpha \frac{1}{|B|} \sum_{i \in B} (\hat{y}_i - y_i) \mathbf{x}_i$$

Advantages of SGD

  • Much faster per iteration (fewer computations)
  • Can escape local minima (noisy updates)
  • Enables online learning (update as data arrives)
  • Works with massive datasets that don't fit in memory

Interactive: Batch vs SGD

Compare batch gradient descent with mini-batch SGD:

Batch size = N: Smooth, deterministic updates

Batch size = 1: Noisy but fast per iteration

Mini-batch: Good balance (typical: 32, 64, 128, 256)

7. Convergence Criteria

When to stop training? Common criteria:

  • Max iterations: Stop after fixed number of steps
  • Loss threshold: Stop when \(J(\boldsymbol{\theta}) < \epsilon\)
  • Gradient norm: Stop when \(\|\nabla J\| < \epsilon\)
  • Parameter change: Stop when \(\|\boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t+1)} - \boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t)}\| < \epsilon\)
  • Validation performance: Stop when validation loss stops improving (early stopping)

8. Regularization

To prevent overfitting, add penalty term to loss function:

L2 Regularization (Ridge)

$$J_{\text{reg}}(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = J(\boldsymbol{\theta}) + \frac{\lambda}{2} \|\mathbf{w}\|^2$$ Gradient becomes: $$\nabla_{\mathbf{w}} J_{\text{reg}} = \nabla_{\mathbf{w}} J + \lambda \mathbf{w}$$

L1 Regularization (Lasso)

$$J_{\text{reg}}(\boldsymbol{\theta}) = J(\boldsymbol{\theta}) + \lambda \|\mathbf{w}\|_1$$ Encourages sparse solutions (many weights become exactly zero).

Interactive: Regularization Effect

See how regularization affects parameter values:

No regularization: May overfit with large weights

L2: Shrinks all weights toward zero

L1: Drives some weights to exactly zero (feature selection)

9. Newton's Method

Second-order optimization using Hessian (matrix of second derivatives):

$$\boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t+1)} = \boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t)} - H^{-1} \nabla J(\boldsymbol{\theta}^{(t)})$$ where \(H\) is Hessian matrix.

Advantages

  • Faster convergence (quadratic near optimum)
  • No learning rate needed

Disadvantages

  • Expensive: requires computing and inverting \(d \times d\) Hessian
  • Not practical for high-dimensional problems (modern LLMs have billions of parameters)

10. Application to LLMs

Training logistic regression teaches fundamentals used in LLMs:

  • Backpropagation: Chain rule for computing gradients (same principle)
  • SGD variants: Adam, AdamW used in transformer training
  • Cross-entropy loss: Same loss for language modeling (over vocabulary)
  • Learning rate schedules: Warmup + decay critical for LLM training
  • Gradient clipping: Prevent exploding gradients
  • Batch size: Trade-off between speed and gradient noise

Interactive: Training Dynamics

Observe complete training process with loss curve:

Final Results

Training Loss: {{finalTrainLoss | number:4}}

Training Accuracy: {{finalTrainAcc | number:3}}

Iterations: {{finalIter}}

Key Takeaways

  • Maximum Likelihood Estimation gives principled approach to parameter learning
  • Cross-entropy loss is negative log-likelihood
  • Gradient has elegant form: (prediction - truth) × feature
  • Gradient descent iteratively moves toward minimum
  • Learning rate critically affects convergence speed and stability
  • Stochastic/mini-batch gradient descent enables large-scale training
  • Regularization prevents overfitting
  • These techniques generalize to neural networks and LLMs
  • Modern optimizers (Adam) build on these foundations

Interactive: Likelihood Surface (w, b)

Explore negative log-likelihood (NLL) landscape for a single-feature logistic regression model. Adjust dataset separability and run gradient descent.

Current w

{{currentW | number:3}}

Current b

{{currentB | number:3}}

NLL

{{currentNLL | number:4}}
Surface shows NLL(w,b). Path points are parameter updates. True optimum approximated by minimizing NLL on generated dataset.

next